Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Charlotte Kokocinski v. Arthur D. Collins, Jr., et al
as 15-3519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charlotte Kokocinski, derivatively on behalf of Medtronic, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Arthur D. Collins, Jr., William A. Hawkins, Gary Ellis and others
Movant - Appellee:
Special Litigation Committee
Jackson v. Boyles
as 4:2015cv01477
Petitioner:
Ashley Ann Jackson
Respondent:
Alana Boyles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Julie Hance, et al v. Medtronic, et al
as 14-8028
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Julie Hance, Joyce Smith, Jonatham Kent Hance and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does, 1-100
Clark v. Ishrak et al
as 0:2014cv04142
Defendant:
Omar Ishrak, Gary L. Ellis, Christopher J. O'Connell and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hockstein v. Collins, Jr. et al
as 0:2014cv04020
Plaintiff:
Richard Hockstein
Defendant:
Arthur D. Collins, Jr., William A. Hawkins, Omar Ishrak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Houston v. Ishrak et al
as 0:2014cv03540
Plaintiff:
William A. Houston
Defendant:
Omar Ishrak , Gary L. Ellis , Christopher J. O'Connell and others
Miscellaneou:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 4:2014cv01636
Plaintiff:
Joyce Smith , Julie Hance , Jonathan Kent Hance and others
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
