Cases 1 - 10 of 80
McKenzie v. Oliver et al
as 4:2026cv00108
Plaintiff:
Dowaine McKenzie
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Ahmad Holt, Benjamin Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Beasley et al
as 6:2025cv00057
Plaintiff:
Katherine Elizabeth Hamilton
Defendant:
Jacob Beasley, Yolanda Byrd, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daker et al v. Oliver et al
as 1:2025cv03898
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Barnes v. Annettia Toby
as 25-12266
Petitioner:
DONALD GENE BARNES
Respondent:
ANNETTIA TOBY and WARDEN
JONES et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2025cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROCHAR JONES
Defendant:
JAMIE CLARK, Warden ANNETTIA TOBY, GEORGE IVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Ward
as 1:2025cv03257
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Ahmad Holt, Jennifer Ammons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Oliver et al
as 1:2025cv03191
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Gregory Dozier, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOSTIC v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00406
Defendant:
STAN SHEPARD, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Warden ANNETTIA TOBY and others
Plaintiff:
NORMAN BOSTIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Defendant:
SARGEANT TUKES, OFFICER EVONNE MARIE FOYE, OFFICER RAPUNZEL TUCKER and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
John O. Dunn, II
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Joseph Burnette, Mr. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
