Cases 11 - 20 of 71
PETERS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
DELMON RICKAY PETERS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, UNIT MANAGER CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and COUNSELOR J JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
WARDEB ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN DEREK HILL, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLTON v. TOBY et al
as 5:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
GEROME BOLTON and LILVENDER BOLTON
Defendant:
Warden ANNETTIA TOBY, Deputy Warden GEORGE IVEY, MELONTAE HAVIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARNES v. TOBY
as 5:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
DONALD GENE BARNES
Respondent:
UNNAMED WARDEN and WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Teasley v. Toby
as 2:2022cv00012
Petitioner:
Christopher Teasley
Respondent:
Annettia Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRANT v. WASHINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER CALPURNIA WASHINGTON, Warden ANNETTIA TOBY, DEP WARDEN SECURITY DEREK HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v KEMP et al
as 7:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
SALEEM D WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN P KEMP, TIMOTHY C WARD, ANNETTIA TOBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCORD v. TOBY
as 3:2021cv00126
Petitioner:
CLARENCE MCCORD, III
Respondent:
Warden ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCullough v. Toby
as 1:2021cv04492
Petitioner:
Brawny McCullough
Respondent:
Annettia Toby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. BERRY et al
as 1:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
CURTIS A BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, DEPUTY WARDEN FRED GAMMAGE, CPT MARY BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
