Cases 1 - 10 of 1,582
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Hall v. Board et al.
as 5:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
James William Hall
Defendant:
Anthony Board, Anthony Board, Jr., Todd McKenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hebert v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01997
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hebert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jackson v. City of Canton et al.
as 5:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Destinee N. Jackson
Defendant:
City of Canton, Lieutenant Lester Marino, Sergeant Bryan McWilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sagers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01860
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sagers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor et al v. Hooven et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Brendon Taylor and Holly Hooven
Defendant:
Jesse Lee Anthony Hooven, City Of Cincinnati, Madison M Paul and others
Young v. Davis
as 1:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Kiaran Young
Respondent:
Warden Anthony Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belton v. Shoop
as 3:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Anthony Belton
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finacchiaro v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01653
Plaintiff:
Anthony Finacchiaro
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sherlock v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65164
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sherlock
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
