Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. .19 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land et al
as 1:2016cv03252
Plaintiff:
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Defendant:
.19 acres, more or less, over the following parcel(s) of land, Approximately 7.795 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 245, 2"d District, 51h Section, of Douglas County, Georgia and in Land Lot 674, 1st District, 3rd Section, of Paulding County, Approximately 1.098 acres, more or less, situated in Land Lot 245, 2nd District, 5th Section, of Douglas County, Georgia and in Land Lot 674, 1st District, 3rd Section, of Paulding County and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
United States of America v. Jones III et al
as 1:2015cv00939
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leeland Anthony Murphy Jones III, John Aaron Murphy Jones, Charles E. Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Jones et al v. Residential Credit Solutions
as 3:2015cv03344
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Jones and Carolyn Jones
Defendant:
Residential Credit Solutions
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Jones v. Residential Credit Solutions Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03698
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Jones
Defendant:
Residential Credit Solutions Inc and Secretary of Veterans Affairds of Washington D.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anthony Jones v. Fulton Bank, N.A.
as 13-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. JONES and CHERYSE D. GLENN JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
FULTON BANK, N.A.
Defendant:
SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.
Jones et al v. Fulton Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Jones and Cheryse D. Glenn Jones
Defendant:
Fulton Bank, N.A. and Samuel I. White, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Landmark Financial Solutions, LLC v. Jones et al
as 8:2012cv02418
Plaintiff:
Landmark Financial Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Jerome Jones and Lynda Kemp Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
