Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tidwell et al v. Chattanooga Fire Protection, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Douglas Tidwell and David Keith Leggett
Defendant:
Chattanooga Fire Protection, Inc. and Joseph Anthony Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDERSON v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2015cv00098
Petitioner:
KEITH HENDERSON
Respondent:
ANTHONY BISHOP, EARLY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JIMMY MURKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Hall et al
as 2:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Hilton Hall, R. Wiggins, Karen Jett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Henderson v. Virginia Hernandez Covington, et al
as 15-11267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, ANTHONY BISHOP, Appeal from Panama City Division, Pensacola Div., Tallahassee Div., Early County Superior Court, Baldwin County Superior Court, Chahooga County Superior Court, Michigan Eastern District, St. Louis Dublin Div., Statesborough Savannah 11th C, JOSE MORALES, Johnson State Prison and others
Keith Henderson v. Shirley Mensch, et al
as 15-11149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHIRLEY P. MENSCH, MARVIN S. ARRINGTON, SR., ANTHONY BISHOP and others
Henderson v. Covington et al
as 3:2014cv01356
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Anthony Bishop, Jose Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waseem Daker v. John Dawes, et al
as 14-13054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MARK DAWES, BRADLEY LOUIS MCENTYRE, MARK ANTHONY BISHOP and others
Daker v. Dawes et al
as 1:2012cv02782
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Mark Dawes, Bradley Louis McEntyre, Mark Anthony Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Talley et al
as 4:2012cv00798
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Bishop
Defendant:
Talley and Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
