Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Li et al v. Clarum, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
ShaoJun Li and Lumy AI, Inc.
Defendant:
Clarum, Inc. and Anton Otaner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00279
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CALLERY et al v. DELOS CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04784
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CALLERY and TINA FASANO
Defendant:
DELOS CAPITAL, LLC, SHOREVEST CAPITAL, LLC, STEVE ZAMBITO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dawn Valli, et al v. Avis Budget Group Inc, et al
as 23-8047
Respondent:
DAWN VALLI and ANTON S. DUBINSKY
Petitioner:
AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC, AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM LLC, BUDGET RENT A CAR SYSTEM INC and others
Guirguis v. Hampden Township et al
as 1:2023cv01684
Plaintiff:
Anton Guirguis
Defendant:
Hampden Township, Officer Johannes Notz and Officer Bradley Corliss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
