Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Juan J. Nunez, Jerry J. Sanchez, Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSH v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2021cv17298
Plaintiff:
FRANK MARSH
Defendant:
ANTONIO CAMPOS, TIMOTHY MAINES, DAVID HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARSH v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2019cv15320
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, IHOUMA NWACHUKWA, NICOLAUS KUEHN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK MARSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. FITZGERALD et al
as 3:2018cv12987
Defendant:
ROBERT CHERTERKIN, ANTHONY CAMPOS, OFFICER FORBES and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON v. DOLCE et al
as 3:2018cv02615
Plaintiff:
ABDUS SAMAD HAMILTON
Defendant:
RALPH DOLCE, STEPHEN D'ILIO, ANTONIO CAMPOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LASANE v. CAMPOS et al
as 3:2017cv06316
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LASANE
Defendant:
ANTONIO CAMPOS, TIMOTHY MAINES, DAVID HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juan Campos v. USA
as 17-56243
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN ANTONIO CAMPOS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shawn July v. Stephen D'Ilio, et al
as 17-1215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN JULY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN D'ILIO, Administrator, ANTONIO CAMPOS, Associate Administrator, J. HINTZ, Sergeant of Department of Corrections and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JIM BARNES, Ex-Assistant Superintendent of NJSP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
