Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Crawford v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crawford v. Designation and Sentence Computation Center et al
as 4:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Designation and Sentence Computation Center, Transgender Executive Council, M Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crawford v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schexnayder et al v. Unknown Party et al
as 4:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Ashdon Schexnayder and Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crawford v. Tubb
as 4:2022cv00190
Petitioner:
Antonio Crawford
Respondent:
A Tubb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crawford v. Unknown Party
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford and Asia
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crawford v. Tubb
as 4:2022cv00140
Petitioner:
Antonio Crawford
Respondent:
A Tubb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schexnayder et al v. Rios et al
as 4:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ashliegh Schexnayder, Asia Crawford, Ashdon Schexnayder and others
Defendant:
M Rios and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schexnayder et al v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ashdon Schexnayder and Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
