Cases 1 - 10 of 35
CRAWFORD v. GARLAND
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
COLETTE PETERS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Antonio Crawford v. Colette Peters, et al
as 23-15371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD, AKA Asia
Defendant / Appellee:
COLETTE PETERS, BOP Director and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
CRAWFORD v. FCI MARIANNA
as 5:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D CRAWFORD and ASIA CRAWFORD
Defendant:
FCI MARIANNA, ADAM MCCORD, KEVIN D PISTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. FCI Marianna
as 1:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Crawford
Defendant:
FCI Marianna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. United States Penitentiary, Tucson
as 4:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Crawford
Defendant:
USP Tucson and United States Penitentiary, Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crawford v. USP Tucson
as 1:2022cv01282
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Crawford
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Antonio Crawford v. Tubb, et al
as 22-16055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD, AKA Asia
Defendant / Appellee:
TUBB, Unknown; Assistant Warden, Federal Correctional Complex, USA Penitentiary, JAMES HAYDEN, Chief Psychologist, Federal Correctional Complex, USA Penitentiary, CATRICIA HOWARD, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex, USA Penitentiary and others
USA v. Antonio Crawford
as 22-2194
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Antonio Crawford v. A. Tubb
as 22-15786
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO D. CRAWFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
A. TUBB
Crawford v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv01254
Petitioner:
Antonio D Crawford
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
