Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00294
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oscar Salazar, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7100
Plaintiff - Appellee: Oscar Salazar, by his parents and next friends, Adela and Oscar Salazar, Pausi Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz, Teresa Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia, and Vernon Hawkins, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Department of Human Services
Oscar Salazar, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7085
Plaintiff - Appellee: Oscar Salazar, by his parents and next friends, Adela and Oscar Salazar, Pausi Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz, Teresa Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia, and Vernon Hawkins, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Department of Human Services,
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Chartered Health Plan
Oscar Salazar, et al v. DC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7065
Plaintiff - Appellee: Oscar Salazar, by his parents and next friends, Adela and Oscar Salazar, Pausi Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz, Teresa Argueta, by her parents and next friends, Orfolio Argueta and Mirna Paz and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, Muriel Bowser, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia and Vernon Hawkins, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Department of Human Services
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Chartered Health Plan
Flores v. Adame
as 5:2016cv00067
Plaintiff: Juan Antonio Flores
Defendant: Adolfo Adame
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04587
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01866
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Oscar Salazar, et al v. DC, et al
as 14-7050
Plaintiff - Appellee: Oscar Salazar, by his parents and next friends, ADELA AND OSCAR SALAZAR, Pausi Argueta, by her parents and next friends, ORFOLIO AGUETA AND MIRNA PAZ, Teresa Argueta, by her parents and next friends, ORFOLIO ARGUETA AND MIRNA PAZ and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, David A. Berns, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Department of Human Services, District of Columbia and Vincent C. Gray, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia,
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Chartered Health Plan and D.C. Chartered Health Plan, Inc.
Oscar Salazar, et al v. DC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7035
Plaintiff - Appellee: Oscar Salazar, by his parents and next friends, ADELA AND OSCAR SALAZAR, Pausi Argueta, by her parents and next friends, ORFOLIO AGUETA AND MIRNA PAZ, Teresa Argueta, by her parents and next friends, ORFOLIO ARGUETA AND MIRNA PAZ and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, David A. Berns, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Department of Human Services and Vincent C. Gray, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Chartered Health Plan and D.C. Chartered Health Plan, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?