Cases 11 - 20 of 20
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 22-2020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ONE-E-WAY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Optis Cellular Technology, LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 22-1904
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc.
as 22-1886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Ameranth, Inc. v. Papa John's USA, Inc.
as 22-1655
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERANTH, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PAPA JOHN'S USA, INC., OPENTABLE, INC., SEAMLESS NORTH AMERICA, LLC and others
Ameranth, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 22-1686
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMERANTH, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLE INC.
Apple Inc. v. Wi-LAN Inc.
as 20-2011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
WI-LAN INC.
The California Institute v. Broadcom Limited
as 20-2222
Defendant / Appellant:
BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, BROADCOM LIMITED and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
The California Institute v. Broadcom Limited
as 21-1527
Defendant / Appellant:
BROADCOM CORPORATION, AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, BROADCOM LIMITED and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem, Ltd.
as 14-1675
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CELGARD, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
LG CHEM, LTD. and LG CHEM AMERICA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
GENERAL MOTORS, LLC and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Intervenor:
APPLE INC.
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 12-1600
Amicus Curiae:
THE FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION, DOW JONES & COMPANY, INC., GANNETT CO., INC. and others
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
