Cases 1 - 10 of 54
LORUSSO v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2022cv04553
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LORUSSO
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROOM v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2022cv03844
Plaintiff:
DEREK CROOM
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. ARAMARK FOOD INC. et al
as 5:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
BRIAN C. OLIVER
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD INC., ARAMARK SUPERVISOR TASSONE, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Clinton County et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Keith Jennings
Defendant:
Clinton County, Aramark Corporation and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv05201
Plaintiff:
LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., ANTHONY FRANKLIN, MARY BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. PrimeCare Medical Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00517
Plaintiff:
Michael Bennett
Defendant:
PrimeCare Medical Inc. , Aramark Correctional Services, Inc. , John Doe-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv05032
Plaintiff:
DANIEL RUSSELL ANDREWS, SR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS and CORIZON MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS-BEY v. PHILA. DEPT. OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv02890
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Defendant:
PHILA. DEPT. OF PRISONS, BLANCHE CARNEY, TERRANCE CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRISONERS UNITED TOGETHER ETAL et al v. WOLF
as 2:2015cv05431
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, KATHLEEN KANE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOEZIEL VAZQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
