Cases filed in Kentucky
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv00636
Plaintiff: Jacob A. Williams
Defendant: Aramark Corporation and Duncan Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2022cv00313
Plaintiff: Jacob A. Williams
Defendant: Aramark Corporation and Duncan Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Aramark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00725
Plaintiff: Jeffery Johnson
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, Martha Dilmaghani, Warden Anna Valentine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00165
Plaintiff: David Wayne Bailey
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Aramark Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00343
Plaintiff: David Wayne Bailey
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, Randy Ingram, John Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Tour Association, Inc. v. Aramark Corporation
as 5:2008cv00242
Plaintiff: National Tour Association, Inc.
Defendant: Aramark Corporation
Counter Claimant: Aramark Corporation
Counter Defendant: National Tour Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Both
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv00083
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hinton v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 3:2006cv00138
Plaintiff: Michelle Hinton
Defendant: Aramark Corporation and Aramark Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2006cv00139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?