Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Arlon Santander-Amador v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 14-50759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLON AVIDAN SANTANDER-AMADOR
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Santander v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2014cv00141
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Arlon A. Santander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlon Santander v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 14-50430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLON AVIDAN SANTANDER-AMADOR
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and MR. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA
Santander v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2014cv00102
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Arlon A. Santander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santander v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2014cv00064
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Arlon A. Santander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agent
as 14-1009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Plaintiff:
MARIO E. GARCIA C., WILLIAM B. SANTOS F., HANKEY MAURICE, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, or MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA
Arlon Santander-Amador v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-60004
Petitioner:
ARLON AVIDAN SANTANDER-AMADOR
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santander v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 9:2013cv00272
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Arlon A. Santander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo, et al v. Six Unknown Names Agent
as 13-1515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG YIL JO
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. SANTOS F., MARIO E. GARCIA C., HANKEY MAURICE, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS, or MR. PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES BARACK OBAMA
Arlon Santander v. Six Unknown Names Agents, et al
as 13-36106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARLON A. SANTANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
SIX UNKNOWN NAMES AGENTS and BARACK OBAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
