Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cleveland Communications, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of Commissioners, et al.
as 1:2023cv01561
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Lorain County Board of Commissioners, David J. Moore, Jeffrey Armbruster and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Buchanan v. S&S / Superior Coach Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv02842
Defendant:
S&S / Superior Coach Company, Inc. and SPV Coach Company, Inc. doing business as Armbruster Stageway
Plaintiff:
Joey Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Armbruster v. Exclusive Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv00532
Plaintiff:
Roger Armbruster
Defendant:
Binatone Global and Exclusive Group, LLC doing business as Binatone North America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
West v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2018cv02694
Defendant:
Karen Stanforth, LaShann Eppinger, Dr. Janice Douglas and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. Eppinger et al
as 1:2018cv00671
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Goff
Defendant:
LaShaunn Eppinger, Ronald Armbruster, Ronald Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Kasich et al
as 4:2016cv02430
Plaintiff:
David E. Clark
Defendant:
John Kasich, Gary Mohr, Mike DeWine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Armbruster v. City of Cleveland
as 1:2013cv02626
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Armbruster
Defendant:
City of Cleveland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Collins et al
as 1:2009cv03010
Plaintiff:
Nakala Desirae Jackson
Defendant:
Terry Collins, William Eleby, Earlena Schorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
