Cases 11 - 20 of 311
ARNOLD v. USA
as 7:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CHARLES ARNOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HODGE v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24738
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT HODGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, K WATKINS, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Labat et al
as 1:2023cv05316
Plaintiff:
Ricky Bell
Defendant:
Sheriff Patrick Labat, Sgt. Hudson, Sgt. Tinwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jermaine Harmon v. Anthony Rhodes, et al
as 23-13805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE ALFONSO HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY W. RHODES, CODY BENSLAY, ERIC HENKEL and others
Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 4:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Arnold Cordell Burk
Defendant:
Catoosa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Diamond M. Arnold
Defendant:
ADOC, Tiffany Wilson, Summer Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hancock v. Lytle et al
as 5:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Troy Brian Hancock, Jr.
Defendant:
Ofc. Lytle and Ofc. Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Torras
as 8:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Christopher Demon Arnold
Defendant:
A. Torras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Fulton County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Reginald Arnold
Defendant:
Fulton County Jail, Sheriff Pat Labait, Napacare Inc. Medical Contractors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schock v. Hoffman et al
as 8:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Arnold Schock
Defendant:
Kurt A. Hoffman and Punthika Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
