Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 55
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff: TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant: USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02062
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
ARNOLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02248
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Arnold v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02014
Petitioner: Zachary Stewart Arnold
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arnold v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00436
Petitioner: Curtis Arnold
Respondent: USA
Interested Party: USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thomas v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03297
Plaintiff: Arnold J. Thomas
Defendant: Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson et al v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03244
Plaintiff: Travis L. Watson, Samuel McCrae, III, Leonzo L. White and others
Defendant: Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Slagle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00140
Petitioner: James Ray Arnold
Respondent: Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arnold v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2021hc02021
Petitioner: Maurice Deshon Arnold
Respondent: Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?