Cases 41 - 50 of 194
Perry v. Wall, et al
as 17-1032
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH PERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, Director, R.I. Dept. of Corrections and PETER F. KILMARTIN, R.I. Attorney General
Ferreira, et al v. Wall, et al
as 16-2452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELBEY FERREIRA and CODY-ALLEN ZAB
Plaintiff:
SHAREN UNDERWOOD and JOHN PACHECO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institutions
Defendant:
ERNIE ZMYSLINSKI, in his official capacity as the Finance Director for the City of Warwick and MARIE AHLERT, in her individual and official capacity as the City Clerk for the City of Warwick
Jefferson v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
Leonard C. Jefferson
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Cory Cloud, Matthew Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miguel v. Wall
as 16-2496
Petitioner:
JOHN S. MIGUEL
Respondent:
ASHBEL T. WALL, Director of R.I. Department of Corrections
Martinez v. Clarke et al
as 1:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez
Defendant:
Jennifer Clarke, Simon Melnick and Ashbel T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Winston v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00630
Plaintiff:
John F. Winston
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Matthew Kettle, Jeffery Aceto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duran v. Wall, et al
as 16-2348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEO L. DURAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, ACI Director and DENNETT, Correctional Officer
Oneal v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00599
Plaintiff:
Eric Oneal
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall and Correctional Officer Crone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Wall et al
as 1:2016cv00548
Petitioner:
Joseph Perry
Respondent:
Ashbel T. Wall and Peter Kilmartin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oliveira v. Wall, et al
as 16-2210
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES F. OLIVEIRA
Respondent - Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL and STATE OF RI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
