Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Darron Thomas v. Chad June, et al
as 21-3192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRON THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD JUNE, and at least two other employees present at City Hall on August 5, 2021, as well as at least four security guards summoned by Chad June and associates, ASHLEY BANKS, and other persons employed by the Government of Philadelphia and either work at the Municipal Court of Philadelphia or at City Hall in Philadelphia or have duties to enforce all the alleged infirmed City or State Statutes, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW, Police Commissioner and others
Darron Thomas v. Chad June, et al
as 21-2796
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRON THOMAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAD JUNE, and at least two other employees present at City Hall on August 5, 2021, as well as at least four security guards summoned by Chad June and associates, ASHLEY BANKS, and other persons employed by the Government of Philadelphia and either work at the Municipal Court of Philadelphia or at City Hall in Philadelphia or have duties to enforce all the alleged infirmed City or State Statutes, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW, Police Commissioner and others
THOMAS v. JUNE et al
as 2:2021cv03683
Plaintiff:
DARRON THOMAS
Defendant:
CHAD JUNE, ASHLEY BANKS, DANIELLE M. OUTLAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Banks et al
as 0:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Rickey Banks, Jr., Ashley Banks and First Resolution Investment Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
DENNIS v. DEAL et al
as 1:2015mc00781
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE DENNIS
Defendant:
NATHAN DEAL, SANDRA DEAL, TASHA MOSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
