Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Ashman v. Holder
as 13-4107
Petitioner:
William St. Elmo Ashman, AKA William Ashman, AKA William John
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ashman
as 1:2012cv09189
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Eric Ashman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
In re: Queen, et al
as 11-3042
Petitioner:
SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN
Respondent:
(FNU) MILDNER, MICHAEL GREY, JOHN CHILDS and others
Southern California Regional Rail Authority et al v. Leticia Magdaleno et al
as 2:2010cv06365
Claimant:
AGL, Barbara Aaronson, Diane Adair and others
Defendant:
Joel Aaronson, Karen Abed, Magdaleno Aida and others
Plaintiff:
Connex Railroad LLC and Southern California Regional Rail Authority
Ometimes Widerkehr:
Helen Widerkehr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell et al v. Castle Stone Homes et al
as 2:2009cv00250
Plaintiff:
Darrell Campbell, Filiberto Vera, Galen Merrell and others
Defendant:
Castle Stone Homes, Martin Tanner, Mills Crenshaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Monahan Ford Corporation of Flushing et al v. Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP
as 2:2009mc50238
Plaintiff:
Richard J McCord
Defendant:
Jaspan Schlesinger Hoffman, LLP
Movant:
Andrew Ashman, Andrew Ashman, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ashman v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv09414
Petitioner:
Boris Ashman
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, The United States Citizenship & Immigrant Services and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
