Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
METRO FIBERNET, LLC v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv03070
Defendant:
AT&T, INC., RYAN MARGERISON, CLEAR HOME, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
METRO FIBERNET, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
W&T, INC. v. SENTRY ROOFING, INC.
as 1:2019cv02909
Defendant:
SENTRY ROOFING, INC.
Plaintiff:
W&T, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hills v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 3:2017cv00556
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, AT, AT&T Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Katia Hills
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00622
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HOLSCLAW v. AT&T, INC.
as 4:2017cv00016
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HOLSCLAW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
INDIANA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00460
Defendant:
AT&T, INC., VTECH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
INDIANA FARM BUREAU INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
DAWSON v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2016cv00616
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T, INC., FIDELITY INVESTMENTS and others
Plaintiff:
JILL E. DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Srivastava v. Payne et al
as 2:2011mc00025
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Herz Srivastava
Defendant:
James Payne , Mitchell Daniels , Randall Shepard and others
WILSON v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00058
Defendant:
AT&T INC., AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN, FIDELITY EMPLOYER SERVICES COMPANY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERESA WILSON
Cause Of Action: O
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
