Cases 1 - 10 of 18
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv07351
Plaintiff:
General Retirement System of the City of Detroit
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., John Stankey, Randall L. Stephenson and others
Petitioner:
Velliv, Pension & Livsforsikring A/S, Bridget N. Smagala Revocable Trust U/A DTD, New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Whitfield v. Discovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10514
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Discovery, Inc., Robert J. Miron, Robert R. Beck and others
Rahman v. Discovery, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv09785
Plaintiff:
Opur Rahman
Defendant:
Discovery, Inc., AT&T, Inc., Drake Subsidiary, Inc. and others
IN RE: AT&T/DIRECTTV NOW SECUR
as 21-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Plan, Iron Workers Locals 40, 361 & 417 Union Security Funds, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Inc., John J. Stephens, Samuel A. Di Piazza, Jr. and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01951
Defendant:
Christopher C. Womack, AT&T Inc., Michael J Black and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Not Classified By Court:
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Interested Party:
Non-Party Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
State of New York et al v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2019cv05434
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Colorado, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Softbank Group Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., Deutsche Telekom AG and others
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc., Altice USA, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 at
IN RE AT&T/DIRECTTV NOW SECURITIES LITIGATION
as 1:2019cv02892
Defendant:
Richard W. Fisher, Cynthia B. Taylor, John J. Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Gross
Lead Plaintiff:
Evan Hassiotis, Martin J. Boot, Iron Workers Local 580 Joint Funds and others
Petitioner:
KBC Asset Management NV and Pro-Alpha Investments Limited
Vera v. The Republic of Cuba
as 18-2345
Petitioner - Appellee:
Alfredo Villoldo, Individually, Jeannette Fuller Hausler, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, Deceased, on behalf of Thomas Caskey as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lynita Fuller Caskey surviving daughter of Robert Otis Fuller, as court-ap, Gustavo E. Villoldo, Individually, and as Administrator, Executor, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Aldo Vera, Jr., a Personal representative of the Estate of Aldo Vera, Sr.
Respondent:
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., RespondentGarnishee and Stakeholder/ThirdParty Petitioner, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and others
Respondent - Appellant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Respondent - Appellee:
Bank of New York Mellon
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
UBS AG
Third-Party-Defendant:
BBVA Colombia S.A., AT&T Corp., Banco Nacional de Mexico (Banamex) and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, or its designee to the extent it or its designee is the successorininterest to Acueducto Yateritas, S.A., Banco Financiero Internacional S.A., Commerzbank AG, as successor in interest to Dresdner Bank AG and others
Appellee:
William Fuller, court-appointed co-representatives of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, deceased, on behalf of all beneficiaries of the Estate and the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A. and others
Intervenor:
National Bank of Canada and National Bank Financial Group
Gorss Motels Inc. v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Plaintiff:
Gorss Motels Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc. , AT&T Inc. , AT&T Mobility Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Telecommunications Act
Dollar Phone Access, Inc. v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2014cv03240
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc., Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dollar Phone Access, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
