Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Calloway et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv06975
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Tift, Mary Hanley, James Bloch and others
Defendant:
AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hills v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC
as 3:2017cv00556
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, AT, AT&T Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Katia Hills
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Seimer v. AT&T, Inc. et al.
as 3:2018cv50200
Plaintiff:
Jeff Seimer
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
HOLSCLAW v. AT&T, INC.
as 4:2017cv00016
Defendant:
AT&T, INC.
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH HOLSCLAW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Edwards v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2016cv04875
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edwards
Defendant:
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAWSON v. PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF AT&T PENSION BENEFIT PLAN et al
as 1:2016cv00616
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC., AT&T, INC., FIDELITY INVESTMENTS and others
Plaintiff:
JILL E. DAWSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Rhoden v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2016cv03075
Plaintiff:
Glennis Rhoden
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Nemitz v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2012cv08039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Nemitz
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Wisse v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1 et al
as 2:2012cv00904
Plaintiff:
Jayne Wisse
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1 and AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Vassos v. AT&T Pension Benefit Plan et al
as 1:2011cv04891
Plaintiff:
Mary Vassos
Defendant:
AT&T Pension Benefit Plan , Benefit Plan Committee (AT&T), AT&T Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
