Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mendez v. AT&T Inc.
as 2:2022cv11010
Plaintiff:
Monica L. Mendez
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., Michigan Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cassaday v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 1:2021cv00715
Plaintiff:
Kevin William Cassaday and RESTRICTED FILER Kevin William Cassaday
Defendant:
AT&T, AT&T Inc. and Direct TV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv11480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc. v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2011cv12303
Plaintiff:
Visual Interactive Phone Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
King v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv11819
Plaintiff:
Janette Lynn King
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and AT&T Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AT&T, Inc. v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Ellis, Roeder and Lazar, P C, et al
as 2:2010cv11070
Plaintiff:
AT&T, Inc.
Defendant:
Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Ellis, Roeder & Lazar, P.C, Law Office Of David L. Martin and Timmis & Inman, L.L.P.
Wafers v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company
as 2:2010cv10678
Plaintiff:
Katina Wafers
Defendant:
Michigan Bell Telephone Company and AT&T Inc.
Lott v. AT&T, Inc.
as 1:2008cv01215
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lott
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
