Cases 1 - 9 of 9
James Shackelford Heating and Cooling, LC v. AT&T CORP et al
as 4:2017cv00663
Plaintiff:
James Shackelford Heating and Cooling, LC
Defendant:
AT&T CORP, AT&T Mobility II LLC and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. AT&T Mobility
as 4:2014cv00366
Plaintiff:
Roland J Parker
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CMS Wireless, LLC v. Prince & Associate
as 12-1045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CMS Wireless, LLC
Defendant:
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, Crown Management, Inc., Crown Project Management, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Prince & Associates
CMS Wireless LLC v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland et al
as 4:2011cv00755
Plaintiff:
CMS Wireless LLC
Defendant:
Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland , Crown Management Inc, Crown Project Management Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaffigan v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 4:2010cv00503
Plaintiff:
John Gaffigan
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Leisman v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 4:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
William Matthew Leisman, William Matthew Leisman, William Matthew Leisman and others
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wood v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 4:2009cv00577
Plaintiff:
Penny Annette Wood
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taylor v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company et al
as 4:2009cv00938
Plaintiff:
Dorthy Taylor
Defendant:
American Telephone & Telegraph Company and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Pauley v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04248
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pauley, Sarah Pauley, Sarah Pauley and others
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. and AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
