Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Thigpen v. Illinois Bell Telephone Company
as 1:2010cv05589
Defendant:
AT&T Operations, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Petina R Thigpen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Hancock et al v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company Inc et al
as 5:2010cv00822
Plaintiff:
Gayen Hancock , David Cross , Montez Mutzig and others
Defendant:
American Telephone and Telegraph Company Inc, AT&T Operations Inc, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company LP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
System Council T-3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. AT&T Teleholdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03703
Plaintiff:
System Council T-3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Defendant:
AT&T Teleholdings, Inc., Illinois Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Motorola, Inc., et al v. Hannstar Display Corporation, et al
as 10-16215
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI INNOLUX and others
Motorola, Inc., et al v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 10-16182
In Re:
In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
MOTOROLA, INC., AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, AT&T CORPORATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor - Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA
Defendant:
CHI MEI INNOLUX, NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC., CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD and others
Amirteymour v. AT&T Operations, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00744
Plaintiff:
Kathy Amirteymour
Defendant:
AT&T Operations, Inc. and Does 1 Through 100
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Matthews v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00287
Plaintiff:
Richard Matthews and Richard Matthews
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Operations, Inc. and Innotrac Corp.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kowalski v. AT&T Operations, Inc.
as 8:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Kowalski
Defendant:
AT&T Operations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
