Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
McCollum v. AT&T Services Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01513
Plaintiff: William McCollum
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc and AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Giddens et al v. AT&T Services, Inc. (CONSENT)
as 3:2022cv00388
Plaintiff: Rushin Giddens and Kristi Giddens
Defendant: AT&T Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robinson v. AT&T Services Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00309
Plaintiff: Roy Thomas Robinson
Defendant: AT&T Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Robinson v. AT&T Services Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01027
Defendant: AT&T Inc and AT&T Services Inc
Plaintiff: Roy Thomas Robinson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01184
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01639
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ryan v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00315
Defendant: AT&T, Inc., AT&T Benefits Center, AT&T Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mark D. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00885
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00385
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Swink v. AT&T Inc et al
as 7:2012cv02708
Plaintiff: Jaime Swink
Defendant: AT&T Inc, AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center, The, AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?