Cases 1 - 10 of 19
SEALY et al v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
as 1:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
DAVID K. SEALY, KERRY CARTER and HARVEY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Whipple v. Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
as 3:2023cv04583
Plaintiff:
Curtis Whipple
Defendant:
Southeastern Freight Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DAVIS v. OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
as 1:2022cv00990
Plaintiff:
HARVEY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Villano v. Northwest Airlines Pension Plan for Contract Employees et al
as 1:2021cv02115
Plaintiff:
Wayne Villano
Defendant:
Northwest Airlines Pension Plan for Contract Employees and Adminstrative Committee for Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Nickerson v. Senn Freight Lines Inc
as 8:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Nickerson
Defendant:
Senn Freight Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Green et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00198
Plaintiff:
Glenn Malcolm Davis and Donnie R Green
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1700 and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Ngamby v. Hamburg et al
as 8:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
Amelie Ngamby
Defendant:
Ember Hamburg, Greyhound Lines, Inc., James Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dockery v. Martz Group/Gold Line, Inc.
as 8:2014cv02455
Plaintiff:
Levian Dockery
Defendant:
Martz Group/Gold Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Caple v. Greyhound Lines Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01964
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc., Amalgamated Transit Union and Amalgamated Transit Union, Local Union 1700
Plaintiff:
David B. Caple
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Perez v. Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Gaines Motor Lines, Inc., Tim Gaines and Rick Tompkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
