Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03849
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10405
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv08235
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Shukla v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al
as 1:2020cv05701
Defendant:
Deloitte Consulting LLP, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), US Attorney for the Southern District of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Ashu Shukla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03782
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Animashaun v. Superintendent of Midstate Correction et al
as 1:2019cv02824
Plaintiff:
Damilola Animashaun
Defendant:
Superintendent of Midstate Correction, John Does, Attorney General of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Animashaun v. Attorney General for the United States et al
as 5:2019cv00512
Plaintiff:
Damilola Animashaun
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of New York and Attorney General for the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
