Cases 11 - 20 of 170
Santoyo Avalos v. B.O.P.
as 4:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Leonel Santoyo Avalos
Respondent:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Fortis Construction LLC v. Avalos
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Fortis Construction LLC and AMS Construction LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Avalos
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bo Wigley and Bo Wiggly
Counter Claimant:
Thomas Avalos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
v. Avalos et al
as 1:2023cv00008
Defendant:
Thomas Avalos and Fortis Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Doherty et al v. Capital Link Management LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01951
Plaintiff:
Tracy Doherty, Eduardo Avalos, Caitlin Stables and others
Defendant:
Capital Link Management LLC, Jonathan Rinker and Samuel Piccione
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Avalos, Jr. v. Striblin et al
as 9:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Feliciano Avalos, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K Striblin, Donald E. Muniz, Kurtis D. Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avalos v. Garland
as 22-60279
Petitioner:
Santos Adolfo Avalos, Adolfo Avalos-Aviles, Cristian Adoris Avalos-Aviles and others
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Avalos-Rodriguez v. USA
as 4:2021cv01346
Petitioner:
Jose Avalos-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
