Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Kevin Lisle v. William Reubart, et al
as 22-99009
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMES LISLE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART and AARON D. FORD
O'Keefe v. Ford et al
as 3:2022cv00327
Petitioner:
Brian Kerry O'Keefe
Respondent:
Aaron D. Ford and Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohamed Mahmoud v. Board of Prison Commissioners, et al
as 22-15440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMED A. MAHMOUD
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS, STEVE SISOLAK, AARON D. FORD and others
Mahmoud v. Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 2:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Mohamed A. Mahmoud
Defendant:
Board of Prison Commissioners, Steve Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gladys Perez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 22-15279
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLADYS PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, FLORENCE MCCLURE WOMEN'S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JAMES DZURENDA and others
McLellan v. Garrett et al
as 2:2022cv00281
Petitioner:
Curt McLellan
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Sean Maurice Dean
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Aaron D. Ford, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keck v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00031
Petitioner:
William Keck
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00017
Petitioner:
Thomas Richardson
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paredes v. Williams et al
as 2:2021cv02232
Petitioner:
Ulises Benites Paredes
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams and Aaron D. Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
