Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Padilla v. Abbott et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Brian Collier, Texas Board of Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macias v. #176 Judicial Dist., Ct. et al
as 3:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
Carlos Macias
Defendant:
#176 Judicial Dist., Ct., Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Ct., Texas Prison Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado et al v. Abbott Laboratories et al
as 3:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Maldonado
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co, Greg Abbott, Lana Mcdaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nutmeg Gaming and Bingo Products, LLC v. Abbott Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00716
Plaintiff:
Nutmeg Gaming and Bingo Products, LLC doing business as CT Bingo Supply and Nutmeg Gaming and Bingo Products, LLC
Defendant:
Abbott Products, Inc., John G Lenzi, Lisa J Lenzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Padilla v. Paxton et al
as 3:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
Ken Paxton and Greg Abbott
Padilla v. Tx. Parole Dept Director et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Tx. Parole Dept Director and Greg Abbott
Taylor v. Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01456
Plaintiff:
Tad Taylor
Defendant:
Abbott Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co and #203rd Dist CT of Dallas Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
