Cases 1 - 10 of 13
SCHULTZ v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC
as 7:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Skye Schultz
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and ABBOTT LABORATORIES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FARMER v. ABBOTT et al
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
GLADYS FARMER
Defendant:
BLAKE ABBOTT, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ABBOTT v. SOUTH GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER
as 7:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA ABBOTT
Defendant:
HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF VALDOSTA AND LOWNDES COUNTY, GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WHITE v. GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W WHITE
Defendant:
GLAXO SMITHKLINE PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CORPORATION, Abbott Laboratories Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
BRINSON v. Abbott Laboratories Inc
as 7:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
RONALD A BRINSON
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHERGI v. Verizon Communications Inc et al
as 7:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
PAUL EUGENE CHERGI
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc, Barack Hussein Obama, Bank of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Abbott Medical Optics Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
L W Daniel
Defendant:
Abbott Medical Optics Inc and Advanced Medical Optics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
