Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv19026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bret Lantz, et al v. Kenneth Kreider, et al
as 10-15778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRET A. LANTZ, DBA Able Services, DBA Hugh Lantz and Associates, HUGH C. LANTZ, DBA Able Services, DBA Hugh Lantz and Associates and JANICE E. LANTZ, DBA Able Services, DBA Hugh Lantz and Associates
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH KREIDER, Individually, and in his official capacity as Director, Board Member of Employee of the State of Nevada Private Investigators Licensing Board, State of Nevada on Relation of the Private Investigators Licensing Board and CAROL HANNA, Individually, and in her official capacity as Director, Board Member or Employee of the State of Nevada Private Investigators Licensing Board, State of Nevada on Relation of the Private Investigators Licensing Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mediator:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
