Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01127
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-16690
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee: DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant: NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Southern Poverty Law Center v. DHS, et al
as 20-5257
Defendant / Appellant: Nathalie Asher, Acting Assistant Director, Field Operations for Enforcement and Removal Operations, in official capacity, Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in official capacity, Claire Trickler-McNulty, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of Detention Policy and Planning, in official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Southern Poverty Law Center, in its individual capacity and on behalf of its clients detained at LaSalle ICE Processing Center, Irwin County Detention Center, and Stewart Detention Center
Yanes, et al v. Martin, et al
as 20-1762
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CENTRAL FALLS DETENTION FACILITY, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Petitioner: OSCAR YANES, WENDELL RAFAEL BAEZ LOPEZ, ELMER ALFREDO AREVALO CARRILLO and others
Codner, et al v. Choate, et al
as 20-1265
Plaintiff: NAOMI LESTHER RAFAEL HERNANDEZ MORALES, ALISON (MELVIN) MENDOZA MENDOZA, BRITANY (JOSE ANTOINIO) RIVIERA CALERO and others
Defendant / Appellee: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JOHNNY CHOATE, in his official capacity as warden of the Aurora Contract Detention Facility owned and operated by Geo Group Inc., JOHN FABBRICATORE, in his official capacity as Denver ICE ERO Acting Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NDI WILFRED TEMAH, MADELINE (FLAVIO) TATIS BELLIARD, SANELA HAMZIC and others
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16276
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee: DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant: NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Molina, et al v. Albence, et al
as 20-1629
Petitioner: ADRIANO DA SILVA MEDEIROS, LUIS ORLANDO DURAND LUYO and JOSE MARCOS PALACIOS MOLINA
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, Acting Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Acting Director, U.S, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DANIEL W. MARTIN, Warden, Donald W. Wyatt Detention Facility and others
Aylaliya Birru v. William Barr, et al
as 20-16194
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, ERIK BONNAR, Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: AYLALIYA ASSEFA BIRRU, AKA Dagem Assefa Birru
Rivera-Medrano v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1573
Respondent: CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, CHARLES BRACKETT, Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections, MARCOS CHARLES, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Acting Field Office Director and others
Petitioner: KAREN ELIZABETH RIVERA-MEDRANO
Smith v. Barr, et al
as 20-5053
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, BARBARA OWLETT, Acting Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States and others
Petitioner: LINCOLN SMITH

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?