Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Goldman v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2013ct03222
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Kieran Shanahan, Tabor Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc et al
as 5:2013ct03158
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc, Mary Pollard, Staff Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDMAN v. SAUNDERS
as 1:2013cv00430
Petitioner:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Respondent:
SORRELL SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDMAN v. MAHER, et al
as 1:2013cv00389
Plaintiff:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant:
THOMAS K. MAHER, DANIELLE M. CARMAN, HEATHER L. RATTELADE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Maher et al
as 5:2013ct03088
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
Thomas K. Maher, Danielle M. Carman, Heather L. Rattelade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOLDMAN v. SAUNDERS et al
as 1:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
LANCE ADAM GOLDMAN
Defendant:
SORRELL SAUNDERS, TORRES, LOWERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Saunders
as 5:2013hc02005
Petitioner:
Lance Adam Goldman
Respondent:
Sorrell Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goldman v. Saunders
as 5:2012hc02258
Petitioner:
Lance Adam Goldman
Respondent:
Sorrell Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goldman v. NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc et al
as 5:2012ct03176
Plaintiff:
Lance Adam Goldman
Defendant:
NC Prisoner Legal Services, Inc, NC Appellate Defender, Staples Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goldman v. Saunders
as 5:2012hc02203
Petitioner:
Lance Adam Goldman
Respondent:
Sorrall Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
