Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Steele v. Hartman et al
as 1:2025cv00021
Defendant:
A. Hartman, Officers of FWPD, Waters and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique D Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41191
Plaintiff:
ADAM HARTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67966
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Augst et al v. Medtronic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Augst , Jody Bauer , Amanda Ayres and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman v. Durrani, M.D. et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Adam Hartman
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, M.D. , Center for Advanced Spine Technologies, Inc. and Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman v. White Hall Pharmacy, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Adam Hartman
Defendant:
White Hall Pharmacy, LLC , C. Gene Wright , Terri Vilain and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hartman v. /white Hall Pharmacy, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Adam Hartman
Defendant:
White Hall Pharmacy, LLC, C. Gene Wright, Terri Vilain and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adam Hartman v. Ebsco Industries, Incorporated, et al
as 13-3398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM HARTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EBSCO INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and KK WARRANTY, INCORPORATED, a corporation formerly known as Modern Muzzleloading, Incorporated doing business as Knight Rifles
Hartman v. Ebsco Industries Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00528
Plaintiff:
Adam Hartman
Defendant:
Ebsco Industries Inc , PI Inc and KK Warranty Inc
Mediator:
Gene Duffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
