Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jenkins v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02233
Defendant:
James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jenkins v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02228
Defendant:
James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ruiz et al v. City Of San Jose et al
as 5:2017cv06488
Plaintiff:
Fernando Ruiz , Daniel Bufano , Elijah El-Amin and others
Defendant:
City Of San Jose, Edago Garcia, Samuel Marquardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2011cv00627
Plaintiff:
Lynn Adams Jenkins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adam Jenkins v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 10-56930
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADAM JENKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Matthews-Washington et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 1:2010cv01262
Plaintiff:
Ethel Jeraldine Matthews-Washington and Mary Loretta Adams-Jenkins
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Provident Funding Associates LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrera et al v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2009cv00858
Plaintiff:
Bernardino Barrera, Bernardino Barrera, Bernardino Barrera and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose, San Jose Police Department, Dennis Dolezal and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adam Jenkins v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 2:2008cv06152
Petitioner:
Adam Jenkins
Respondent:
Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Jenkins v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 2:2008cv02750
Petitioner:
Adam Jenkins
Respondent:
Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
