Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Billy Riley v. Timothy Filson, et al
as 17-15335
Petitioner - Appellee:
BILLY RAY RILEY
Respondent - Appellant:
TIMOTHY FILSON, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and STATE OF NEVADA
Thomas v. Filson et al
as 2:2017cv00475
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Marlo Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hosmer v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2017cv00064
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, James Cox, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hosmer v. Sandoval et al
as 3:2017cv00056
Defendant:
Aranas, Artinger, Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hosmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corzine v. Laxalt et al
as 3:2017cv00052
Defendant:
Patrick J. Conmay, Adam Paul Laxalt, K. Lomprey and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Corzine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLellan v. Baker et al
as 2:2016cv03038
Respondent:
Renee Baker and Adam Paul Laxalt
Petitioner:
Curt McLellan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02515
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bailey
Defendant:
Steven D Grierson, Thomas Groves, Judge Adair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv02435
Plaintiff:
Jackson Brown
Defendant:
Barbara K Cegavske, County of Clark, David M Doto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jacob Pratt v. Adam Laxalt, et al
as 16-16553
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB RAMIE PRATT
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM PAUL LAXALT, JAMES COX, CONNIE BISBEE and others
Newton v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv01915
Defendant:
Adam Paul Laxalt and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Charles Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
