Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Adams et al. v. Fruth et al.
as 6:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
Victor Lee Adams and Jesse James Adams
Defendant:
Staci LeAn Fruth and Skip O'Dell Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Adams v. Brown
as 6:2023cv01178
Plaintiff:
Aubrey M. Adams
Defendant:
Ralph E. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Roberson (ID 104710) v. Chiles et al
as 5:2023cv03205
Plaintiff:
Adam Paul Roberson
Defendant:
Nathaniel Chiles, Centurion and Kelly Knipp
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGI Suretrack, LLC v. Tackett et al
as 2:2023cv02372
Plaintiff:
AGI Suretrack, LLC
Defendant:
Seth Tackett and Adam Weiss
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud and Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Behrendt v. UnitedLex Corporation
as 2:2023cv02371
Plaintiff:
Adam Behrendt
Defendant:
UnitedLex Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Phelps v. Kansas, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02206
Plaintiff:
Shawn Burke Phelps
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Smith County Kansas, City of Smith Center, Kansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson (ID 104710) v. Williams
as 5:2023cv03112
Petitioner:
Adam Paul Roberson
Respondent:
Tommy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
