Cases 1 - 10 of 634
Divelbiss, Randin v. Wollin, Sam et al
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Randin Divelbiss
Defendant:
Chief Sam Wollin, Officer Smith and Adams Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wiegert, Dale v. Adams County et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dale Wiegert
Defendant:
Adams County, Brent R. York and Jim Bialecki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ocampo v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ocampo
Defendant:
Illinois State Police and Adam W Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dekeyser et al v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
ALLEN J DEKEYSER, MARQUETA T DEKEYSER, Allen Dekeyser and others
Defendant:
PO LEON BURNS, PO ADAM RUSCH, CITY OF MILWAUKEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Benyoun v. East Chicago IN City of et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marcus C. Benyoun and Marcus C Benyoun
Defendant:
City of East Chicago, IN, Louis Gonzalez, Adam Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
