Cases 41 - 50 of 192
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DIRCKS et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
RICHARD PAYNE, JEFFREY KELLER, BENNII WELDY and others
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DIRCKS and BARRY DIRCKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teeple v. Adams County Regional Sewer District
as 1:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Adams County Regional Sewer District
Plaintiff:
Connie Teeple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Schwartz et al v. Adams County Regional Sewer District
as 1:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Roman Schwartz, Amos Schwartz, Eli Hilty and others
Defendant:
Adams County Regional Sewer District
Not Classified By Court:
Anthony Stites
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
RASHID BEY v. MOORE et al
as 1:2020cv03200
Defendant:
ALAN WEIMER, ALLAN WILSON, ROBERT BAKER and others
Plaintiff:
AR RAZZAAQ RASHID BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLLIDAY v. HILL et al
as 2:2020cv00653
Defendant:
KEVIN BARRETT, MARGARET SUSAN HILL, K. REDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TERRYON M. GOLLIDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neely v. Swinehart et al
as 1:2020cv00433
Defendant:
Officer Adam Swinehart, Deputy S. Geist, S Geist and others
Plaintiff:
William Neely
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
YASHAR'AL v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2020cv02988
Defendant:
FRANK MECKLENBURG, JOHN WICKER, KENDALE ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
YASHIYAH MIKA'AL YASHAR'AL
Intervenor:
ELDER ACHASHVEROSH ADNAH AMMIYHUWD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
