Cases 1 - 10 of 463
Ames v. Chisago County et al
as 0:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
James Ames
Defendant:
Chisago County, Adam Cinelli, Matthew Jacobson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Stacey Adams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Traylor v. Minnesota Dept of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv01275
Plaintiff:
Rayco DelShaune Traylor
Defendant:
Minnesota Dept of Corrections, Binkley, Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Church v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Justin Dale Church
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jamison Doeden, Kathryn Halverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ailion v. Healthcare Solutions Team, LLC
as 0:2024mc00017
Respondent:
Adam Ailion and Healthcare Solutions Team, LLC
Petitioner:
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Storrs et al v. Gables at Arbor Pointe Homeowners Association, The
as 0:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
Adam Storrs, Anthony Storrs, Findley Holdings L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Gables at Arbor Pointe Homeowners Association, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
