Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,440
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant: CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff: JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
COHEN
as 2:2024mc00019
ADAMS v. KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01679
Plaintiff: SHAMAR ADAMS
Defendant: KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sciarra v. State Capitol Police Dept et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff: Christopher Sciarra
Defendant: State Capitol Police Dept and Adam Eubanks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P. v. ADAMS et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff: DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P.
Defendant: J. MICHAEL ADAMS, JR., Richard W. Bloomingdale, AMY BRADLEY and others
VARGO v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: MICHAEL J VARGO
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE and ADAM P WASSELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01433
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
POMROY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01416
Plaintiff: SHERRI POMROY
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER ADAM TRUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quarles v. Youngkin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00573
Plaintiff: Allan Quarles
Defendant: James Youngkin, Eric Wiltrout, C.O. Trouchin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lovejoy v. Adams et al
as 3:2024cv00532
Petitioner: Alex Leroy Lovejoy
Respondent: Melinda Adams and Pennsylvania Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?