Cases 1 - 10 of 49
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2024cv00559
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
JULIE LYNCH, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, FREDERICK D. BENTON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AL-HAWSAWI v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02907
Petitioner:
MUSTAFA AHMED ADAM AL-HAWSAWI
Respondent:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and LANCE A. OKAMURA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARTOLI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
ERIC BARTOLI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFFERY M. OLSON, JOHN R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS-DAVIS v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2021cv01377
Defendant:
P. ADAMS, LARRY J. LEABOUGH and MERRICK GARLAND
Plaintiff:
LENNORA R. BANKS-DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENNINGS v. MCKANE et al
as 1:2021cv01228
Defendant:
YANASH, P. ADAMS MCKANE, JORGE and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GUIRLANDO v. COHEN et al
as 1:2020cv03490
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY JAIL, DERRICK DRISCOLL, DEANNA HOPSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCO GUIRLANDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. FOSTER GARVEY P.C.
as 1:2019cv03662
Defendant:
ASHLEY BALCERZAK, KASELEHLIE PRESS, WILLIAM JAYNES and others
Plaintiff:
CARY LEE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2019cv02769
Plaintiff:
VICTOR JOHNSON, KENNETH WATKINS, JERICUO MISSOURI and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIRLEAF v. SCHIFF et al
as 1:2019cv02523
Defendant:
ROD ROSENSTEIN, LYNDA BURROWS, ANDREW MCCABE and others
Plaintiff:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAITE v. NOLTE et al
as 1:2018cv01097
Plaintiff:
KIRK WAITE
Defendant:
JAMES NOLTE, CRYSTAL PEARSALL, EMMANUEL ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
