Cases 1 - 10 of 1,461
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wesley v. Neal
as 24-40234
Plaintiff:
Logan Wesley, III
Defendant:
Jeff Neal, Sheriff, FNU Walker, Captain, FNU Malone, Sergeant and others
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Bryan Bailey, Christan Dedman, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Unknown Officers et al
as 4:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Adam James Wilcox
Defendant:
Unknown Officers, Harris Health and JPS Booking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muniz v. Montgomery County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Juan Muniz, Jr.
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff Department, Deputy Adam Johnson and Deputy Zachary Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ Bryan Collier, Officer Henry Adams, Doctor Farly Lamb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20110
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, re
Adams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20106
Petitioner:
Alex Adams
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hickson v. Haulcy
as 24-30165
Plaintiff:
Henry Hickson
Defendant:
Terrance Haulcy, Danny Henshaw, Captain Jones and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
