Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Baltas v. Salisbury, Jr. et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joe J. Baltas
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Rui Diniz, Barry Weiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. Coyne-Fague
as 1:2020cv00149
Respondent:
Particia Coyne-Fague, Patricia A. Coyne-Fague and Attorney General for the State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Adam Lake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, M 4307 Nelligan, David D Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Neufville v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Respondent:
Ronald D Vitiello, M 4307 Nelligan, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Nyanati Jermaine Neufville
Interested Party:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cobb v. USA
as 1:2018cv00051
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Adam Cobb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Diaz v. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Samuel Diaz
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Matthew Kettel, Jenkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00279
Plaintiff:
Donnell Greene
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Adams, Matthew Kettle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Wall et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Tristian Walker
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, David McCauley, James Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins-Sanchez v. Wall et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Frank Collins-Sanchez
Defendant:
A.T. Wall, David McCauley, Warden Weeden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
