Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nazarian v. Adecco USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01274
Plaintiff:
Artin Nazarian
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 5:2014cv04145
Plaintiff:
Rajan Nanavati
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Judy Calhoun v. Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv04100
Plaintiff:
Judy Calhoun
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Digital Intelligence Systems, LLC, Does 1-50, inclusive and others
Not Classified By Court:
Randall Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03760
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
J. Robert Berrellez v. Rose International Inc et al
as 2:2014cv03163
Plaintiff:
J. Robert Berrellez
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Does 1-50 inclusive, Rose International Inc and others
Not Classified By Court:
Randall Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Libel,Assault,Slander
Miller, et al v. CEVA Logistics USA, Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv01321
Defendant:
CEVA Logistics USA, Inc. and Adecco USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ken Miller , Jeremie Todd and Christopher Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wvense D Amador Jr v. Celestica Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00771
Defendant:
Adecco USA Inc, Celestica Corporation and Does
Plaintiff:
Wvense D Amador, Jr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
