Cases 1 - 10 of 48
United Airlines, Inc. et al v. Keep Safe Investments, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv03426
Plaintiff:
United Airlines, Inc., United Airlines Retirement Plans Administrative Committee and United Airlines Pilot Retirement Account Plan
Defendant:
Keep Safe Investments, LLC, J&K Connect LLC and Kristi Berge
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dionicio et al v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 0:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Ana L. Dionicio and Alejandro M. Wesaw
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp, Board of Directors of U.S. Bancorp, U.S. Bancorp's Benefits Administration Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Adams et al v. U.S. Bancorp et al
as 0:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Adams, Patricia J. Pettenger and Marla K. Snead
Defendant:
U.S. Bancorp, Benefits Administration Committee, the and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Daniel Matousek, et al v. MidAmerican Energy Company, et al
as 21-2749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel C. Matousek, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Teresa J. Cantu, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Leah M. Maloney, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
MidAmerican Energy Company, The Board of Directors of MidAmerican Energy Company, MidAmerican Energy Company Pension and Employee Benefits Plans Administrative Committee and others
The Employee Benefits Administration Committee v. AlaskaCare Retiree Health Plan
as 4:2021cv04119
Plaintiff:
The Employee Benefits Administration Committee for and on Behalf of the Northwestern Energy Flexible Componsation Plan and Its Component Plan the Health Benefit Plan for All Active Employees of NorthW doing business as Northwestern Energy and The Employee Benefits Administration Committee For and On Behalf of Northwestern Energy Flexible Compensation Plan and Its Component Plan the Health Benefit Plan for All Active Employees of Northwestern Corporation doing business as NorthWestern Ener
Defendant:
AlaskaCare Retiree Health Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Snyder v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv01049
Defendant:
UnitedHealth Group Inc., David S. Wichmann, The UnitedHealth Group Employee Benefits Plans Administrative Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Snyder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Hastings v. Principal Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Principal Life Insurance Company, Benefits Plans Administrative Committee and Benefits Plans Investment Committee
Plaintiff:
David J. Hastings
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Matousek et al v. MidAmerican Energy Company et al
as 4:2020cv00352
Plaintiff:
Leah M. Maloney, Daniel C. Matousek and Teresa J. Cantu
Defendant:
The Pension and Employee Benefits Plans Administrative Committee of MidAmerican Energy Company, MidAmerican Energy Company, The Board of Directors of MidAmerican Energy Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Merrill v. U.S. Bank Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan et al
as 0:2019cv01655
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Benefit Claim Subcommittee, Benefits Administration Committee of U.S. Bank, U.S. Bank Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Merrill and Lindsay M. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Valeska Schultz, et al v. Shiyang Huang
as 19-2158
Defendant / Appellee:
David Gibson, Edward Jones Profit Sharing and 401(k) Administrative Committee, Ann Echelmeier and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Melanie Waugh, Rosalind Staley and Valeska Schultz
Plaintiff:
Windle Pompey and Charlene F. McDonald, individually and on behalf of a class of all other persons similarly situated, and on behalf of the Edward D. Jones & Co. Profit Sharing and 401(k) Plan
Other:
Heath J. Petsche and Anna Mae Krause
Not Yet Classified:
Shiyang Huang
Defendant:
John & Jane Does, 1-25 and The Jones Financial Companies
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
